Year-on-year growth has long been used by larger grocery retailers as the metric that defines success.

Through negotiation, retailers can secure the kind of assortment, deals and promotions that improve volume sales and raise revenue, all while potentially lowering the base cost of goods or discovering added promotional spend.

Suppliers also want the chance to negotiate, because attention on their product lines helps increase their own efficiency and drives incremental sales growth, writes Ed Betts, SVP General Manager at Retail Express. But while successful negotiation is a win-win, it rarely happens organically. It is an active process which demands that every small efficiency is optimised, and all too often, overburdened retailers can leave a lot on the table by not engaging effectively.

Don’t neglect the small ones

Joint business plans made with major multi-line vendors demand frequent and careful attention, which can lead to major suppliers being given a disproportionate amount of time, while some small suppliers may struggle to secure a meeting even once a year.

Failing to negotiate with smaller suppliers makes no sense – they may not present the same big-ticket products that larger companies do, but there is plenty of money to be made through smaller scale relationships. Smaller suppliers can present new, innovative products, and are often ready to offer significant deals. But they do not have the deep pockets of larger suppliers, nor do they typically have the access to push for promotions to happen.

The burden of negotiation, in this situation, is currently the wrong way around. To keep up with market trends retailers must find the time to listen to every incoming request or, better, reach out to smaller suppliers directly. To do so requires a change in the structure of negotiation processes, to which AI-driven automation is a strong solution. It may be used to ensure margins are met, and to speed up smaller-scale negotiations with larger suppliers, allowing senior staff to make high-level decisions surrounding innovative lines rather than being mired in minutiae.

Acting with foresight

The negotiation stage is not only an opportunity to secure better deals but also the time to ensure every possible advantage is discovered and activated. Making volume purchases could save on per-item costs, for example, but a retailer must have some certainty and foresight that it will be able to sell those products before a deal is finalised.

This is where a keen understanding of past, present, and predicted future markets becomes vital – and it is another instance where AI tools and predictive models can provide the backbone of a sturdy negotiation process as well as reducing the time and effort load on those making the deals. With predictive AI in place, retailers can be certain of the strength of a deal as it is made, rather than finding out when it is too late. It may also highlight the truth by comparing, say, an offering of a vendor with initially deep pockets against an alternative which may generate more money in the long run.

Securing every possible advantage

Marketing pots can be quite large but are not always central to the negotiation conversation. Automated systems can help ensure all trade funds are collected efficiently, without fail – and this reliable automation lowers the need for expensive auditing and reduces potential collections costs.

Knowing one’s capacity for action allows algorithmic models to help generate a detailed plan at the negotiation stage, defining not only the terms of any proposed promotion but also the viability of a promotion before it happens plus the effort required to put a sale or marketing campaign into action. In traditional retailing, such a process would delay negotiations by days or weeks; using algorithmic retailing models, the process is fast and automatically lines up the relevant business functions to be ready when a deal goes into action.

Dealing with regulatory demand

With the potential for imbalances in power between retailer and supplier there are regulations in place like the Groceries Supply Code of Practice (GSCOP), and its worldwide equivalents, to govern the nature of the conduct between the negotiating parties.

For large retailers, breaching GSCOP can lead to unthinkable fines. Staff must be trained to avoid any action which could go against regulations. But if supplier negotiations are given a layer of automation to ensure they are performed in a systematic and consistent manner, this burden can be reduced. That kind of depth and reliability is the lynchpin of algorithmic retailing, the process of linking a big data model with automated and AI-assisted processes to connect all parties with the information that matters.

Gaining agility and adaptability

Algorithmic retailing techniques do not replace the inherently personal practice of negotiation with suppliers. They complement it, streamlining otherwise time-consuming processes, and add a single point of record which ensures that the complex procedure of putting deals into action is handled from that point on.

And if a supplier’s situation changes or a retailer’s commercial objectives are altered, a data-forward approach allows retailers to adapt to change, renegotiating quickly and with confidence even when the plans are in flight.

If retailers are to have the time to innovate and chase growth, they must focus on negotiating with those suppliers which can offer innovative goods and leave nothing on the table. With the right tools, these things are possible.

 

Comments are closed.


Agreement

To use this website, you must be aged 18 years or over

This will close in 0 seconds